Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLópez Vargas, Omarspa
dc.contributor.authorRivera Borja, Ángela Maríaspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.available2019-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.otherTO-23637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/10940
dc.description.abstractEl presente documento corresponde a una tesis de grado para obtener el título de Maestría en Tecnologías de la Información Aplicadas a la Educación, que estudia la relación entre autoeficacia, estilo cognitivo, modelo TPACK, nivel profesional, asignatura de desempeño, nivel escolar de desempeño, tipo de institución educativa y edad del docente en el departamento de Antioquia.spa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAutoeficacia docentespa
dc.subjectModelo TPACKspa
dc.subjectEstilo cognitivospa
dc.subjectAutoeficacia del PCspa
dc.titleRelación entre autoeficacia, estilo cognitivo, el Tpack y variables socio académicas de docentes en el Departamento de Antioquia.spa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.referencesAlmerich, G., Orellana, N., & Díaz García, M. (2015). Las competencias en TIC en el profesorado en formación y su relación con las creencias pedagógicas, la autoeficacia y la percepción del impacto de las TIC en la educación. AIDIPE, 589-597.
dc.relation.referencesAlomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-based Learning Design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188-196. Recuperado el 11 de 03 de 2018, de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ903824
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Recuperado el 21 de 6 de 2017
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 359-373.
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
dc.relation.referencesBanoglu, K., Vanderlinde, R., & Yildiz, R. (2015). Professional Self-Efficacy Scale for Information and Computer Technology Teachers: Validity and Reliability Study. The Anthropologist, 22-23.
dc.relation.referencesCabero Almenara, J., & Barroso Osuna, J. (2016). Formación del profesorado en TIC: una visión del. Cultura y Educación. doi:10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526
dc.relation.referencesCabero Almenara, J., Barroso Osuna, J., Cadena León, A., Castaño Garrido, C., Cukieman, U., Llorente Cejudo, M., . . . Ortiz Colón., A. (2014). La formación del profesorado en TIC: Modelo TPACK. Conocimiento Tecnológico Pedagógico y de Contenido. Secretariado de Recursos Audiovisuales y Nuevas Tecnologías de la Universidad de Sevilla, 24-28. Recuperado el 19 de 06 de 2017, de https://idus.us.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11441/32292/la%20formacion%20del%20profesorado%20en%20TIC.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCarneiro, R., Toscano, J., & Díaz , T. (2008). Los desafíos de las TIC para el cambio educativo. Colección Metas Educativas 2021, 113-126. Recuperado el 27 de 07 de 2017
dc.relation.referencesCassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing , 26(2), 133-153. Recuperado el 23 de 01 de 2018, de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNV
dc.relation.referencesCastillejos López, B., Torres Gastelú, C., & Lagunes Domínguez, A. (2014). El enfoque del Conocimiento Tecnologico Pedagogico del Contenido (TPACK): Revisión del modelo. Los Modelos Tecno-Educativos, revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI, Primera edición , 237-252. doi:978-1-312-90072-1
dc.relation.referencesChai, C., Ling Koh, J., Tsai, C.-C., & Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 1184-1193. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
dc.relation.referencesChen, S., & Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American society for information science and technology,, 3-15. Recuperado el 18 de 2 de 2018
dc.relation.referencesDíez Gutiérrez, E. (2012). Modelos socioconstructivistas y colaborativos en el uso de las TIC en la formación inicial del profesorado. Revista de educación (Ministerio de Educación de España)(358), 175-196. Recuperado el 1 de 05 de 2018, de http://buleria.unileon.es/handle/10612/2197
dc.relation.referencesEnochs, L. G., Riggs, I. M., & Ellis, J. D. (1993). The Development and Partial Validation of Microcomputer Utilization in Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument in a Science Setting. School Science and Mathematics, 257-263.
dc.relation.referencesFrank, B. (1986). Cognitive Styles and Teacher Education: Field Dependence and Areas of Specialization among Teacher Education Majors. The Journal of Educational Research, 19-22. Recuperado el 26 de 07 de 2017
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, C., Días, P., Sorte,, A., Díaz, J., Leal, A., & Gandra, M. (04 de 04 de 2014). El uso de las TIC y herramientas de la web 2.0 por maestros portugueses de la educación primaria y educación especial: la importancia de las competencias personales. Revista del Currículum y formación del profesorado, 241-255. doi:ISSN 1989-639X
dc.relation.referencesHandal, B., & Herrington, A. (2004). On being dependent or independent in computer based learning environments. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 7(2). Obtenido de https://eric.ed.gov/?q=on+being+dependent+or+independent+in+computer+based+learning+environments&id=ej850352
dc.relation.referencesHarrisa, J., & Hofera, M. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers' Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related lnstructional Planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
dc.relation.referencesHederich, C., & Camargo, A. (1999). Estilos cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-Colciencias. Recuperado el 24 de 07 de 2017, de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christian_Hederich/publication/266074278_estilo_cognitivo_y_logro_academico_en_la_ciudad_de_bogota/links/56e948aa08ae693eaf279027.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJang, S.-J., & Tsai, F, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59, 327–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
dc.relation.referencesKoehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740-762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
dc.relation.referencesKoehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education.
dc.relation.referencesKoh, J., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. J. Educational Computing Research,, 44(1), 35-58. doi:10.2190/EC.44.1.c
dc.relation.referencesKorumaz, M., & Karabiyik, B. (2014). Effects of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Perception on Computer Assisted Teaching Perception. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2243-2247. Recuperado el 02 de 06 de 2017, de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814005692
dc.relation.referencesLee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 121-128. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service K12 teachers' technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55-74. Obtenido de https://aplicacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2584/doi/pdf/10.1177/0735633115585929
dc.relation.referencesLópez Vargas , O., Hederich Martínez, C., & Camargo Uribe, Á. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2). doi:http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-05342012000200002&lang=pt
dc.relation.referencesLópez Vargas, O., & Triana Vera, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación , 225-244.
dc.relation.referencesLópez Vargas, O., Duarte Suárez, L., & Ibáñez Ibáñez, J. (2017). Teacher’s computer self-efficacy and its relationship with cognitive style and TPACK. Improving Schools, 1-14.
dc.relation.referencesMEN, M. d. (2014). Competencias TIC para el desarrollo profesional docente. (I. Nacional, Ed.) Colección Sistema Nacional de Innovación Educativa con uso de Nuevas Tecnologías, 72. Recuperado el 03 de 4 de 2017, de http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-339097_archivo_pdf_competencias_tic.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMessick, S. (1984). The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice. Educational Psychologist, 59-74.
dc.relation.referencesPamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439. doi:0.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
dc.relation.referencesParaskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (16 de 10 de 2006). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 1084–1091. doi:doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006
dc.relation.referencesPithers, B. (2000). Field dependence - field independence and vocational teachers. International Post-Compulsory Education and Training Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland., 1-10. doi:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.198.7459&rep=rep1&type=pdf
dc.relation.referencesPoy, R., Segarra, P., Pastor, M., Montañés, S., Tormo, M., & Moltó, J. (2004). Emoción, Autoeficacia y Cognición. Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I,, 81-88.
dc.relation.referencesPrieto Navarro, L. (2001). La autoeficacia en el contexto académico. Exploración bibliográfica comentada, 1-14. Recuperado el 7 de 5 de 18
dc.relation.referencesSalanova, M., Grau, R., Martínez, I., Cifre, E., Llorens, S., y García Renedo, M. (2004). Nuevos horizontes en la investigación sobre la autoeficacia. Castelló de la Plana : Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I,(8). Recuperado el 23 de 04 de 2017
dc.relation.referencesSang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 03–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
dc.relation.referencesSaracho, O. (1989). The early childhood teachers' cognitive styles and their instructional behaviors. Early Child Development and Care, 99-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443890480109a
dc.relation.referencesSaracho, O. (1991). Students' Preference for Field Dependence-Independence Teacher. Educational Psychology, 323-332.
dc.relation.referencesSaracho, O., & Spodek, B. (1981). Teachers' Cognitive Styles Educational Implications. The Educational Forum, 154-159. doi:10.1080/00131728109336066
dc.relation.referencesSawa, H. (1966). Analytic thinking and synthetic thinking. Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Nagasaki University, 1-16.
dc.relation.referencesScherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 202-2014.
dc.relation.referencesScherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modelling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 123-149.
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje. Una perspectiva educativa (Sexta Edición ed.). México: Pearson Educación.
dc.relation.referencesShulman, L. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational researcher, 4-14. Recuperado el 26 de 03 de 2017, de http://depts.washington.edu/comgrnd/ccli/papers/shulman_ThoseWhoUnderstandKnowledgeGrowthTeaching_1986-jy.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTee, M., & Lee, S. (2011). From socialisation to internalisation: Cultivating technological pedagogical content knowledge through problem-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 89-104. Obtenido de https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/984/257
dc.relation.referencesTinajero Vacas, C., & Páramo Fernández*, M. F. (2013). El estilo cognitivo dependencia independencia en el proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 57-78. Recuperado el 17 de 06 de 2017
dc.relation.referencesTschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 783–805.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H., & Goodenough, D. (1979). Psychological differentiation. Estilos Cognitivos Natutaleza y Origen.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H., Goodenough, D., & Karp, S. (1967). Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 291-300. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025070
dc.relation.referencesZhang, S., Liu, Q., & Cai, Z. (2019). Exploring primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-19. doi:doi:10.1111/bjet.12751
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/